Thinking of joining a study?

Register your interest

NCT06842082 | NOT YET RECRUITING | Intubation Intratracheal


The Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laringoscopy for Residents Intubation Study
Sponsor:

Lucus Augusti University Hospital

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Maria Bermudez Lopez

Brief Summary:

The usual intubation technique in the operating room is based on direct laryngoscopy, using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. However, this skill is not easy to acquire and requires adecuate training. Videolaryngoscopes are becoming a widely accepted airway management technique. because offer better view of the glottis and are easy to use. In addition, indirect laryngoscopes are useful for tracheal intubation by novice operators because of the feedback that supervisors can offer during intubation. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which intubation technique performed by residents of anesthesia in the operating room is better. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Which intubation technique is more effective for achieving first-attempt intubation? * Which intubation technique results in fewer complications? Researchers will compare both intubation techniques performed by anesthesia residents in the operating room in adult anesthesia cases.

Condition or disease

Intubation Intratracheal

Airway Management

Intervention/treatment

Intubation with standard laryngoscope

Intubation with video laryngoscope

Phase

NA

Detailed Description:

The study will randomize, by means of a computer-generated randomization, approximately 1008 adults in two groups: Conventional group (Laryngoscope with Macintosh Blade) and Videolaryngoscope group (Mac-Style Blade) to be intubated in the operating room by an anesthesia resident. Success rate of the selected technique (first attempt), overall success rate, number of attempts, complications, and duration of insertion for technique will be noted.

Study Type : INTERVENTIONAL
Estimated Enrollment : 1008 participants
Masking : SINGLE
Primary Purpose : SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Official Title : A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind Study Comparing Direct Laryngoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Performed by Anesthesia Residents in the Operating Room
Actual Study Start Date : 2025-05-05
Estimated Primary Completion Date : 2025-12-29
Estimated Study Completion Date : 2025-12-29

Information not available for Arms and Intervention/treatment

Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study: ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
  • * ≥18 years old
  • * Patients who need to be tracheal intubated for a surgical intervention in the surgical area.
  • * Intubation performed by an anesthesia resident.
Exclusion Criteria
  • * Need for tracheal intubation with a device other than videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy (fiberoptic bronchoscope, tracheostomy...).
  • * Context of a Difficult Airway Management.
  • * Refusal of the patient

The Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laringoscopy for Residents Intubation Study

Location Details

NCT06842082


Please Choose a site



How to Participate

Want to participate in this study, select a site at your convenience, send yourself email to get contact details and prescreening steps.

Locations


Not yet recruiting

Spain, A Coruña

Ferrol University Hospital

Fierce, A Coruña, Spain,

Not yet recruiting

Spain, A Coruña

Santiago University Hospital Complex

Santiago, A Coruña, Spain,

Not yet recruiting

Spain, Pontevedra

Alvaro Cunqueiro Vigo hospital complex

Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain,

Not yet recruiting

Spain, Pontevedra

Povisa de Vigo Hospital

Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain,

Not yet recruiting

Spain,

University Hospital Complex of A Coruña

A Coruña, Spain,

Not yet recruiting

Spain,

Princess University Hospital

Madrid, Spain,

Not yet recruiting

Spain,

Hospital Complex Universitario de Ourense

Ourense, Spain,

Not yet recruiting

Spain,

Pontevedra Hospital Complex

Pontevedra, Spain,

Loading...