NCT06481657 | COMPLETED | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Detailed Description:

The study population: The study recruited 24 patients with heart failure who came to the cardiac rehabilitation program at Laniado Hospital who met the inclusion criteria. After receiving an explanation of the study, the participants were asked to sign an informed consent form and were randomly divided into 2 training groups, with and without oxygen administration. A sample, using G-power software, medium effect size (0.3), power 0.8 and an error of 0.05 was found to be equal to 24 participants. Measurement and evaluation tool: Maximum effort protocol: to assess the maximum aerobic capacity, a graded exercise test was performed on a moving track according to the Bruce protocol. which began by walking at 2.4 km/h and a 10% incline, every three minutes the incline and speed were increased until the subject reported that he/she could not continue any longer. At the end of each step the heart rate was recorded Heart rate and the subjective degree of difficulty according to the Borg scale. The last stage reached by the subject was used to determine multiple values (calculated heart rate and maximum oxygen consumption). Aerobic submaximal exercise protocol: the test consisted of walking on a track at an incline and speed determined according to the phase corresponding to the Bruce protocol in which the patient reached 80% of the maximum heart rate at the beginning of the training program, the participant was asked to persist in walking until he could not continue at the required pace and reached fatigue. Record the time and distance until the end of the effort. A submaximal exercise protocol to compare single exercise conditions with and without oxygen: In order to compare the effect of supplementing oxygen in a single exercise some of the participants (n=20) performed a submaximal exercise protocol with and without oxygen in two consecutive sessions and in random order. The tests were performed on a rail at an incline and speed determined according to the phase corresponding to the Bruce protocol in which the patient reached 80% of the heart rate. In the test under oxygen conditions, oxygen supplementation of \~20% (5 liters per minute) was given using oxygen goggles, and in the test under conditions without oxygen supplementation (placebo) room air was given (5 liters per minute) using oxygen goggles. Every three minutes, the heart rate was recorded, the feeling of exertion and the level of lactic acid in the blood, the time and distance that the participants gulped until they reported that they could not continue with the given effort was recorded. The tests were done within 72 hours and in random order. Calculation of metabolic expenditure (METs (Metabolic Equivalent of Task): one METs defines the amount of oxygen consumption at rest, sitting in a chair, and is equal to 3.5 ml of oxygen per kilogram of body per minute, METs during the training program in effort on a track is calculated according to speed and gradient according to The following formula: METs=(0.1Xspeed+1.8XspeedXgrade+3.5)/3.5 Metabolic expenditure in the maximal effort protocol was calculated for each minute during the Bruce protocol. Borg scale: a reliable and valid subjective tool for assessing difficulty when performing an effort, where a rating of 6 indicates no effort at all, while a score of 20 indicates maximum effort The level of lactic acid in the blood: measured using Lactate Scout+, . Lactic acid levels were measured before the start of the test while resting on a chair and with effort every 3 minutes and at the end of the test. Calculation of target heart rate in training according to the Karbonan formula: target heart rate at the beginning of training is calculated as 50% of the heart rate reserve according to the following formula: resting heart rate\] + 50% percentage of maximum capacity X (maximum heart rate - resting heart rate)\]. Functional test for assessing walking ability: (6MWT) Six Minute Walk Test: a clinical test used to assess aerobic capacity, which is found to be reliable and valid for assessing the functional status of heart failure patients. The test includes a six-minute walk where the instruction is given to walk the maximum distance that can be achieved in six minutes.. Questionnaire to assess quality of life in heart failure patients The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): This questionnaire was found to be valid, reliable and sensitive to quality of life in heart failure patients. The questionnaire consists of 23 questions, where a higher score indicates a higher quality of life. The sections of each question are divided by a hundred (according to the number of possible answers in each section), when you can get a maximum of one hundred points for each question. The overall score is an average of all sections. A score below 45 indicates a poor quality of life. An improvement in the overall score of 5 points indicates a slight improvement, an improvement of 10 points indicates a moderate improvement, and an improvement of 20 points indicates a great improvement in the quality of life. In addition, an improvement in the overall score of 5 points indicates a reduction of approximately 7% in the risk of death or hospitalization. And every 10-point improvement indicates a 14% reduction in the risk of death or hospitalization.Disease severity index - New York Heart Association - NYHA: a valid and accepted index for assessing the severity of the disease based on symptoms of shortness of breath Power throughout the training program: during the training program, the speed and incline that the participants walked on the treadmill were measured at 4 time points and the METs were calculated according to the following formula: METs=(0.1Xspeed+1.8XspeedXgrade+3.5)/3.5. The strength of the training in resistance exercises: in the second month of the training, 2 resistance exercises were combined for the patients One for the upper limbs and one for the lower limbs for the exerciser's choice, the weight was adjusted at which the participant was able to perform 15 repetitions while reporting a degree of difficulty of 15 "hard effort" on the Borg scale (RPE-15). 5.4. Research Process Upon admission of the patients to the Balneado Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, a cardiologist's assessment was performed to check inclusion criteria and release them to the study. At this stage, the doctor or physiotherapist made an appeal to those who met the inclusion criteria to participate in the study. After a detailed explanation of the study and its requirements, those interested in participating were asked to give their consent in writing and were given Randomized to one of two groups (with oxygen, and a control group). Both groups trained with oxygen goggles during all aerobic efforts throughout the training program, the O2 group trained with oxygen supplementation of 5 L/min and the control group trained without oxygen enrichment with air flow room (placebo). In the first week upon admission to rehabilitation, the patients underwent a graded exercise test until fatigue according to the Bruce protocol. At the end of each step of the protocol, heart rate data was collected from the heart rate monitor and the level of difficulty according to a report. 50% of the heart rate reserve according to the maximum heart rate reached by the patient in the graded exercise test. In this session, the participants filled out the Kansas Quality of Life Questionnaire, the severity of the disease was rated according to the NYHA rating, and a six-minute walk test was performed. In the second week, the patients in both groups performed 2 submaximal tests on a track at a speed and gradient corresponding to the stage at which they reached 80% of the maximum heart rate in the maximum test. This test was done with oxygen goggles with added oxygen and without it (placebo) (in random order) with a difference of 72 hours between the tests. Heart rate, RPE and lactic acid concentration were sampled in all the trainees until the end of the test. During the training program, which lasted 8 weeks and included two sessions per week, one hour each, the participants exercised according to the target heart rate determined by the physiologist, at RPE 13. Throughout the training program, if the patient reported an RPE lower than 12 for the target heart rate given to him The target heart rate was increased according to the heart rate reserve by 5%. The course of the training in the first month included: five minutes of warm-up, then 20 minutes of walking on a track, 15 minutes of cycling, ten minutes of aerobic equipment of each participant's choice and finally five minutes of active recovery. In the second month after walking and cycling, two strength exercises were combined: one for lower limbs and one for upper limbs according to the exerciser's choice, for each exercise 3 sets of 10-15 repetitions were performed at a hard effort level (RPE-15). The intensity of effort in each training session was recorded for each participant. At the end of the program, after 8 weeks, an additional assessment of maximal aerobic capacity was performed using a maximal graded exercise test, a continuous submaximal test until fatigue according to the stage in the Bruce protocol that the patient performed at the beginning of the program. These two tests were performed for both groups without oxygen supplementation. In addition, the participants were asked to fill out a Kansas Quality of Life questionnaire and perform a six-minute walk test. 5.5. Data Analysis Descriptive statistics were performed to describe the study population for demographic, anthropometric variables, disease characteristics, years of illness and NYHA score, functional indices and quality of life questionnaire score. All variables were tested for normal distribution by the Smirnoff Kolmogorov test. Variables that were not normally distributed were monotonically transformed and retested for normal distribution. Variables found to be normal were reported as mean and standard deviation and variables not normally distributed (NYHA) were reported as median and quartiles. In order to test the differences between the 2 groups in the outcome measures (maximum power in a maximal effort test, time and distance in a submaximal test, a six-minute walk test and a quality of life questionnaire score) a 2 way ANOVA mixed model repeated measures analysis model was used to find a central effect of group (O2 , control), time (before and after training), and the interaction between them (time x group) if the interaction was found to be significant, a simple mean analysis was performed to check the source of the difference. For the NYHA score (an ordinal variable) the PROC GENMODE procedure was used, which allowed the use of a 2 way ANOVA model. To find the difference in the severity of the disease in the two groups before and after the training program. In testing the difference between the groups in training power (according to METs) at 4 different times in the weeks (W) of the training program (W1, W3, W6, W8), a Bonferroni type post hoc analysis was conducted to test the source of the differences. In order to test the differences between performing a single submaximal exercise test with and without oxygen supplementation of each participant (within) in measures of the feeling of exertion (RPE), heart rate and lactic acid levels at each stage, the slope was calculated throughout the time each test lasted. A smaller slope indicates a more moderate increase in the tested variable over time, and expresses better aerobic capacity at submaximal power. Differences in slopes between performing a submaximal test with and without oxygen were tested by the signed rank test Data analysis was done using SAS software version 9.4. p\< 0.05 was set as money for statistical significance.