Thinking of joining a study?

Register your interest

NCT06355986 | NOT YET RECRUITING | Atrial Fibrillation


Computerized Decision Support to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor:

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Gregory Piazza, MD, MS

Brief Summary:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preventable cause of stroke. However, despite widely available risk stratification tools, numerous options for oral anticoagulation, and evidence-based practice guidelines, anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF is consistently under-prescribed. In a pair of observational cohort analyses within the Mass General Brigham (MGB) health system, prescription of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF was less frequent in ambulatory clinic patients than in those who were hospitalized at the time of assessment (46.9% vs. 57.2%). Two single academic medical center randomized controlled trials demonstrated success for increasing adherence to guideline recommendations for stroke prevention in AF. To address the feasibility and impact of a computerized decision support (CDS) strategy in the non-tertiary care, community medical center setting, this study will involve a multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial of a more sophisticated CDS focused not only on implementation stroke prevention but also on bleeding risk assessment and management.

Condition or disease

Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke

Intervention/treatment

Alert-based computerized decision support

Phase

NA

Detailed Description:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preventable cause of stroke. However, despite widely available risk stratification tools, numerous options for oral anticoagulation, and evidence-based practice guidelines, anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF is consistently under-prescribed. In a pair of observational cohort analyses within the MGB health system, prescription of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF was less frequent in ambulatory clinic patients than in those who were hospitalized at the time of assessment (46.9% vs. 57.2%). Implementation science strategies, including computerized decision support (CDS), have been proposed as solutions to improve adherence to guideline recommendations. A previously conducted randomized controlled trial of alert-based CDS in 458 high-risk hospitalized patients with AF who were not being anticoagulated showed that the alert nearly tripled the proportion of hospitalized patients with AF and high-risk of stroke who were prescribed anticoagulation during the hospitalization, at discharge, and at 90 days compared with the control group. CDS in this trial was associated with an 88% reduction in the frequency of stroke or systemic embolic event and 87% reduction in the frequency of myocardial infarction (MI) at 90 days. A subsequent trial demonstrated that clinician-directed, alert-based CDS doubled prescription of antithrombotic therapy in high-risk ambulatory care patients with AF who were not prescribed anticoagulation at the time of randomization. A major lesson from the second trial was the importance that perceived bleeding risk played in the shared decision-making process between clinician and patient. These two trials demonstrated that bleeding risk is the predominant consideration when omitting anticoagulation or choosing to bypass a CDS alert. Clinicians often overestimate bleeding risk compared with objective bleeding risk scores (HAS-BLED). Both prior trials were executed at a large tertiary-care center in Boston, Massachusetts. The feasibility and impact of an alert-based CDS strategy to improve stroke prevention in AF among ambulatory care patients in the community setting and outside of major tertiary-care centers remains to be determined. To address the feasibility and impact of a CDS strategy in the non-tertiary care, community medical center setting, this study will involve a multicenter, community-based, cluster-randomized controlled trial of a more sophisticated CDS focused not only on implementation stroke prevention but also on bleeding risk assessment and management.

Study Type : INTERVENTIONAL
Estimated Enrollment : 2500 participants
Masking : TRIPLE
Masking Description : Assignment to a particular cluster (ALERT or NO ALERT) will be masked to the patient participant, investigator, and outcomes assessor. Since the intervention is a computer alert to the provider of record, he/she will be aware of whether or not a notification is provided.
Primary Purpose : PREVENTION
Official Title : Community-Based, Cluster-Randomized Trial of Electronic Alert-Based Computerized Decision Support to Prevent Stroke in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AF-ALERT3)
Actual Study Start Date : 2026-12-01
Estimated Primary Completion Date : 2027-07-30
Estimated Study Completion Date : 2027-07-30

Information not available for Arms and Intervention/treatment

Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study: ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
  • * Male and Female
  • * Age ≥ 18 years
  • * Problem list entry of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
  • * CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 2 for males
  • * CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 3 for females
  • * No prescription for anticoagulant therapy
Exclusion Criteria
  • * Active prescription for anticoagulant therapy
  • * CHA2DS2VASc score \< 2 for males
  • * CHA2DS2VASc score ≤ 2 for females

Computerized Decision Support to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation

Location Details

NCT06355986


Please Choose a site



How to Participate

Want to participate in this study, select a site at your convenience, send yourself email to get contact details and prescreening steps.

Locations


Not yet recruiting

United States, Kentucky

St. Elizabeth Health

Edgewood, Kentucky, United States, 41017

Not yet recruiting

United States, Massachusetts

Mass General Brigham

Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115

Loading...