Unity Health Toronto
Periprosthetic distal femur fractures are a significant source of morbidity and mortality for elderly patients. One treatment option involved a surgical fixation with plates or nails, screws and cables/wires along the side of your fractured bone. The second method consists in replacing your knee joint with an artificial knee prosthesis (artificial knee joint). The primary objective is to determine if acute distal femur replacement improves knee pain and functional outcomes compared to surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes are mortality, reoperation, complications, post-operative pain and quality of life. A health economic analysis will be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of both treatments. A total of 148 patients (74/group) will be enrolled in the study.
Distal Femur Fracture
Periprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant Knee
Knee Fracture
Distal Femur Replacement
Surgical fixation
NA
Study Type : | INTERVENTIONAL |
Estimated Enrollment : | 148 participants |
Masking : | NONE |
Primary Purpose : | TREATMENT |
Official Title : | PDIFFIR: Geriatric Periprosthetic DIstal Femur: FIxation Versus Replacement - a Randomized Controlled Trial of Acute Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) Versus Distal Femur Replacement (DFR) |
Actual Study Start Date : | 2025-02-28 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | 2030-12-10 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | 2032-12-10 |
Information not available for Arms and Intervention/treatment
Ages Eligible for Study: | 65 Years |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | ALL |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: |
Want to participate in this study, select a site at your convenience, send yourself email to get contact details and prescreening steps.
RECRUITING
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8