Detailed Description:

Using a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach, the investigators will work with community partners to develop a culturally grounded, trauma-informed alcohol intervention. The investigators will collaborate with community partners to design, implement, and evaluate this intervention program. A strength of this approach is that in using existing structures, settings, and resources, this intervention will be able to be more easily sustained over time. This work will occur in two stages. Stage 1a, will occur in two phases; first, talking circles will be used to develop the intervention/manual. In this stage, the investigators will explore their place in the community, identifying important stakeholders, recognizing strengths and resources at the local level, pinpointing settings in the community where research and intervention can potentially or already is taking place, and developing a strong communication and collaboration plan that involves community members and researchers to allow for an exchange of knowledge that is bi-directional. Talking circles will identify Indigenous knowledge and practices related to historical trauma and alcohol use. Benchmark: The end of this first phase will yield a manual. Results from the talking circle will provide important knowledge on the targets, techniques, and mechanisms of change for the intervention, as well as the structure of the intervention, including number and length of sessions, treatment setting, and format (group or individual). Second, the investigators will conduct an open pilot trail that will provide information on the manual, delivery of the intervention, and acceptability of participants. Community members (n = 5) will be recruited to go through the intervention and provide qualitative feedback after each session that will be used to further refine intervention components. Benchmark: Open pilot participants will help further refine the manual for delivery in the randomized pilot trial. During Stage 1b (pilot randomized trial), the investigators will test the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of the program in a randomized, 2-group pilot clinical trial. Participants (N=60) will be randomized to either a wait-list-control (WLC) group (n=30) or to the culturally grounded, trauma-informed alcohol intervention (n=30). Alcohol outcomes will be assessed at baseline, completion, and 3 and 6 months post-completion. The investigators will evaluate whether the program shows promise relative to the WLC group in terms of alcohol consumption, historical losses and response, well-being, and community connectedness. Benchmarks: Major intermediate objectives are: 1) adequate recruitment volume, 2) achievement of targeted enrollment goals, and 3) follow-up rates >= 85% in Stage 1b pilot trial. In the unlikely scenario that recruitment lags, the investigators will first increase field efforts at flyering and following up recruitment letters. If recruitment continues to lag, the investigators have existing relationships with other Indigenous communities in the nearby area that share the same cultural heritage and language. If follow-up rates lag, telephone follow-ups will be intensified and follow-up incentives will be increased as allowed by budgetary constraints. The investigators will also consider truncating 6-month follow-ups to include only those items necessary for alcohol use.}}