University of Jaen
Agustín Aibar Almazan
This comparison examines the effectiveness of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine in managing iatrogenic wounds in surgical patients. Both antiseptics are commonly used to prevent postoperative infections, but they differ in mechanism, efficacy, and safety profiles. Povidone-iodine releases iodine, which acts broadly against bacteria, viruses, and fungi, while chlorhexidine disrupts cell membranes, providing rapid bactericidal action. Studies suggest that chlorhexidine may offer longer-lasting antibacterial effects, but povidone-iodine has a wider antimicrobial range. Optimal choice depends on patient needs, wound type, and potential for adverse reactions, emphasizing the need for tailored antiseptic strategies in wound care.
Wound
Povidone-Iodine
Chlorhexidine
NA
Study Type : | INTERVENTIONAL |
Estimated Enrollment : | 107 participants |
Masking : | TRIPLE |
Primary Purpose : | TREATMENT |
Official Title : | Comparison of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine in the Management of Iatrogenic Wounds in Surgical Patients |
Actual Study Start Date : | 2025-01-07 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | 2025-04-01 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | 2025-04-04 |
Information not available for Arms and Intervention/treatment
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | ALL |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: |
Want to participate in this study, select a site at your convenience, send yourself email to get contact details and prescreening steps.
RECRUITING
María Juana Millán Reyes
Jaen, Spain, 23007