University Hospital, Bordeaux
The large hiatal hernia (LHH) now represents approximately 50% of laparoscopic antireflux surgical practice. In a non-comparative retrospective study of 399 patients operated for LHH with onlay patch of a bioprosthetic absorbable (Gore® Bio-A® HH0710) mesh with a mean follow-up of 44 months, 16% had a symptomatic recurrence with 7,9% requiring reoperation, one patient had oesophageal stenosis. No comparative effectiveness data exist to date. Hypothesis: the incidence of postoperative hiatus hernia would be reduced by the addition of biosynthetic absorbable mesh reinforcement to a standardized suture repair technique, as compared to laparoscopic repair without mesh, without increasing the risk of complications. The main objective is to compare the radiologic recurrence rate at 2 years between standardized herniorrhaphy with onlay biosynthetic absorbable mesh repair versus standardized herniorrhaphy with no mesh in symptomatic LHH.
Large Hiatal Hernia
Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair
Not Applicable
The large hiatal hernia (LHH) now represents approximately 50% of laparoscopic antireflux surgical practice. Aging of the population and improvement of perioperative management may suggest that the number of these interventions will increase in the next few years. However, recurrence is common and has been described in up to 30% of patients who have undergone laparoscopic repair after a median follow up of 24 months. The use of mesh reinforcement has been suggested to help preventing recurrence after LHH repair with non-absorbable and absorbable mesh. In a non-comparative retrospective study of 399 patients operated for LHH with onlay patch of a bioprosthetic absorbable (Gore® Bio-A® HH0710) mesh with a mean follow-up of 44 months, 16% had a symptomatic recurrence with 7,9% requiring reoperation, one patient had oesophageal stenosis. No comparative effectiveness data exist to date. Hypothesis: the incidence of postoperative hiatus hernia would be reduced by the addition of biosynthetic absorbable mesh reinforcement to a standardized suture repair technique, as compared to laparoscopic repair without mesh, without increasing the risk of complications. The main objective is to compare the radiologic recurrence rate at 2 years between standardized herniorrhaphy with onlay biosynthetic absorbable mesh repair versus standardized herniorrhaphy with no mesh in symptomatic LHH. The secondary objectives are : To compare the improvement of specific symptoms between two arms; To compare the Quality of life; To compare the complication rate and thecomplication severity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; To assess the cost-effectiveness of standardized herniorrhaphy with onlay biosynthetic absorbable mesh repair as compared to standardized herniorrhaphy with no mesh, in symptomatic LHH, at 2 years, from the French Healthcare system point of view. The expected benefits are : for the patient the diminution of LHH recurrence rate, quality of life improvement for Public health: Reducing the rate of reoperation for LHH; Reduction of healthcare costs due to a decrease in proton pump consumption and surgical re-interventions; The use of a synthetic bioprosthesis in laparoscopic surgery could be largely recommended and reimbursed either through the tariff related to the hospital stay (DRG tariff) or in additionto this tariff; Long term follow-up up to 5 years, could be obtained thanks to the use of French health insurance databases.
Study Type : | Interventional |
Estimated Enrollment : | 256 participants |
Masking: | Double |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Onlay Synthetic Bioabsorbable Mesh Herniorrhaphy Versus Herniorrhaphy Only in the Primary Treatment of Large Hiatal Hernia: a Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Evaluator Blinded, Phase III Clinical Trial |
Actual Study Start Date : | January 15, 2024 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | January 18, 2028 |
Estimated Study Completion Date : | January 18, 2028 |
Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Biosynthetic absorbable mesh Patients who have undergone hiatal surgery with use of a biosynthetic absorbable mesh |
Procedure: Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair |
Sham Comparator: No biosynthetic absorbable mesh Patients who have undergone hiatal surgery without use of a biosynthetic absorbable mesh |
Procedure: Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair |
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Want to participate in this study, select a site at your convenience, send yourself email to get contact details and prescreening steps.
Not yet recruiting
CH de la Côte Basque
Bayonne, France, 64100
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Jean Minjoz, CHRU de Besançon
Besançon, France, 25000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Cavale blanche, CHRU de Brest
Brest, France, 29000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Côte de nacre, CHU Caen Normandie
Caen, France, 14000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Estang
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP
Colombes, France, 92700
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Nord, CHU de Grenoble
La Tronche, France, 38700
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU de Lille
Lille, France, 59000
Not yet recruiting
Polyclinique du bois, Hôpital privé Le Bois
Lille, France, 5900
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Dupuytren 1, CHU de Limoges
Limoges, France, 87000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, HCL
Lyon, France, 69000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Saint Eloi, CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, France, 34000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France, 44000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Archet, CHU de Nice
Nice, France, 06000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP
Paris, France, 75010
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP
Paris, France, 75012
Not yet recruiting
DMU SAPERE, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP
Paris, France, 75013
Not yet recruiting
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, France, 75014
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP
Paris, France, 75018
Recruiting
Hôpital du Haut Lévêque
Pessac, France, 33600
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Jean-Bernard, CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, France, 86000
Recruiting
CH René-Dubos
Pontoise, France, 95000
Not yet recruiting
CHU de Rennes, Site PONTCHAILLOU
Rennes, France, 35000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Charles Nicolle, CHU de Rouen
Rouen, France, 76000
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Felix-Guyon, CHU de la Réunion
Saint Paul, France, 97415
Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, France, 31000